Equipping Extend Commerce with design tools and a UX/UI analysis to elevate design maturity and enhance user experience across their product portfolio.
ESTIMATE SIMILAR PROJECTTo gain a better understanding of the user experience with Extend WMS, we conducted qualitative research. This approach allowed us to observe real-world interactions and hear directly about the challenges users face. We chose qualitative methods because we wanted to deeply understand how the system affects users' daily tasks and identify pain points that might not be captured by quantitative metrics. We did:

We hired Blueprint to conduct an analysis, and their report was both detailed and valuable. Their professional approach and knowledge impressed us, and we look forward to benefiting from the insights in our continued work. Working with them was smooth and gave us concrete tools to improve the user experience of our product.
Anton Bildh
Head of Product, Extend Commerce
The onboarding section reveals general satisfaction with the WMS process, but users expressed a need for more learning tools. Inexperienced users rely on colleagues for training rather than using the system’s learning platform. Additionally, the manual lacked troubleshooting resources, and a long gap between training and launch led to forgotten information.A key issue was losing personalized settings from the test system at launch, requiring rework. Users appreciated the support from Extend employees but were hesitant to troubleshoot independently. There were varying levels of system knowledge, and all users expressed a desire to learn more.
We discovered several critical UI issues. Key functions were placed inconsistently, forcing users to scan or scroll excessively. Buttons lacked a clear design hierarchy, with key actions often appearing less prioritized. The interface was cluttered with complex tables and fields, making it difficult to navigate and obscuring important information. Essential UI elements, like search fields and product lists, were under-prioritized, and poor use of spacing caused elements to blend together. The UI lacked consistency, leaving users guessing functions and navigating through irrelevant information.
The report observed several inefficiencies in the order navigation process. Pickers relied on printed order sheets, which were logged manually on desktops. Finding an order required at least five interactions, leading to inefficiency. The orders screen was cluttered with irrelevant filter options, overwhelming users. The option to customize filters was often missed due to poor placement, and the key "Show also started" filter had to be manually selected each time. Barcode scanning for order IDs only inputted the ID into the search bar, requiring an additional step to access the order page.
Based on the research findings, we created recommendations to enhance the user experience, addressing specific challenges and opportunities for a more seamless, intuitive and satisfying interaction.
These recommendations are designed to create a more effective and enjoyable experience for all users, ultimately driving greater productivity and satisfaction within the system.